When building AI applications using Large Language Models (LLMs), handling long text correctly is critical.
Because LLMs have context window limits, we must split documents into smaller chunks before sending them to models or storing them in vector databases.
LangChain provides several text splitters, but one stands out as the best default choice for most applications:
RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
This article explains what it is, how it works internally, why it is preferred, and how to use it correctly—especially for RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems.
Why Text Splitting Is Necessary
LLMs cannot read unlimited text at once.
Common challenges:
Long documents exceed context window limits
Naive splitting breaks sentences and meaning
Poor chunking leads to bad retrieval results
To solve this, we split text into semantically meaningful chunks.
The Problem With Simple Character Splitting
A simple approach is to split text every N characters.
Example:
LangChain is a framework for developing appli
cations powered by language models.
This causes:
Broken sentences
Loss of meaning
Poor embeddings
Low-quality search results
👉 We need smart splitting, not blind slicing.
What Is RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter?
RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter is a LangChain text splitter that:
Preserves meaning first and enforces size limits second
Instead of using a single separator, it:
Tries larger semantic units first
Recursively falls back to smaller units only when needed
This makes it ideal for real-world AI applications.
Core Idea (In One Line)
“Split text in the most meaningful way possible, and only break it further if the chunk is still too large.”
How Recursive Splitting Works Internally
Default separator priority order:
\n\n → Paragraphs
\n → Lines
" " → Words
"" → Characters (last resort)
Step-by-step logic:
Split text using the first separator
Check chunk size
If chunk is too large → move to next separator
Repeat recursively until size is acceptable
This is why it’s called recursive.
Simple Example
Input text
LangChain is a framework for developing applications powered by language models.
It enables applications that are context-aware and reasoned.
Output chunks
Complete sentences are preserved
No broken words
Chunk size respected as much as possible
✔️ Meaning stays intact
✔️ Better embeddings
✔️ Better retrieval
Basic Usage Example
Understanding chunk_size
A very important point:
chunk_size is a target, not a hard rule
The splitter tries to keep chunks under this size
But it will not break meaningful units unnecessarily
Slight variations are normal and expected
This behavior is intentional and beneficial.
Understanding chunk_overlap
chunk_overlap = 10
Why overlap matters:
Prevents loss of context between chunks
Improves semantic continuity
Helps during retrieval and answer generation
Example:
Chunk 1: "...context-aware applications"
Chunk 2: "context-aware applications using language models"
Overlap ensures important phrases appear in multiple chunks.
Custom Separators (Advanced Usage)
You can customize separators based on your document type.
Markdown documents
Code documents
This makes the splitter structure-aware.
Recursive vs Character Text Splitter
Best Chunking Values for RAG
Blogs / Articles
chunk_size=800
chunk_overlap=150
Research papers / PDFs
chunk_size=1000
chunk_overlap=200
Documentation / Manuals
chunk_size=1200
chunk_overlap=250
Always tune based on document type and model context size.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
❌ Expecting exact chunk sizes
❌ Using character-based splitting for RAG
❌ Zero overlap
❌ Extremely small chunks
❌ Ignoring document structure
When Should You Use RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter?
Use it when:
Building RAG pipelines
Indexing long documents
Creating embeddings
Working with PDFs, blogs, or documentation
It should be your default splitter unless you have a very specific reason not to use it.
Final Takeaway
RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter preserves meaning first and size second—which is exactly what modern AI applications need.
If you get chunking right, everything else in RAG works better:
Better embeddings
Better retrieval
Better answers
No comments:
Post a Comment